Einstein being wrong has been Top Secret

Einstein is wrong and NASA knows that Einstein is wrong. NASA is famous as being also known as “Never A Straight Answer”. There are plenty of other conspiracies on the web about NASA; so why shouldn't they cover up about Einstein as well, and the answer is of course there is.

There is an elite in the Physics community that knows Einstein is wrong, and they are maintaining the false front that Einstein is still a genius; they don't care that those below them are deceived and working from a physics that is wrong.

All of this is of course just another small part of a vast cover-up. Einstein is there to cover-up a lot of other things. If there was no Einstein to divert physics enthusiasts then they might take Tesla related things more seriously. So Einstein is absolutely necessary to sit on top of the pyramid and cover up everything else they don't want you to know about in physics.

Before citing the evidence of the information sources, first a little history:

Einstein became famous in 1919 straight after World War 1, he fled to America before the start of World War 2 and backed the Allies against the Germans. He was on the winning side in both World Wars, he was hailed as genius, a hero a pacifist etc etc. So he has an enormous fan base for being a hero. But most heroes turn out to have feet of clay.

Try now to look at it from another perspective: for us he was hero, but from the other side of the wars he looked different. During World War 1 instead of being a patriotic German, backing Germany; he was a pacifist during the war and he was with a group of fellow German pacifists blaming Germany for starting the war. He was not patriotic to his country, from his country's viewpoint he was a traitor. For us a hero, to the other side he was a traitor. He was on the winning side in both World Wars and history gets written by the winners not the losers, so the winners' view of him prevails – that of him being a hero, and the loser’s point of view gets ignored; hence massive publicity of just what a genius and hero Einstein is.

Taking the point-of-view that Einstein is wrong – well that's almost like taking the view that Hitler was right; so its not something his fans want to do.

Physics should not be about personalities. But sadly in Einstein's case it is; it is a political issue that he must be portrayed as a hero genius. So Einstein being wrong is not something his fans want. Einstein stumbled a bit on quantum theory with his clash with Bohr, allowance is made by his fans for that; but for Einstein's relativity theories – his personal theories – his fans don't want him wrong about that. Hence this fan-based support for this massive cover-up. The experimental evidence does not agree with Einstein, and an elite knows it does not agree, but because its political they cover it up. Every now and again an experimental result might break through claiming a result that disagrees with Einstein. But what “they” (who want to cover-up) then do is go back and cover it up, claiming the experiment was done wrong.

The cover-up is just massive, and it is not just about Einstein, it extends to the rest of the sciences. Results that are deemed politically incorrect are covered up.

As some conspiracy theorists say – it does not matter who you vote for, the government still gets in. The same corruption is applied to experiments – if experiments could actually prove something they didn't want us to know then they would be banned. Results they don't want get rejected.

What we have is the Corruption of Science – science has become a political football.

Einstein's relativity is a bit obscure, but for the sake of illustration, I will highlight how one aspect of it can be represented namely - Einstein's special relativity can be looked at it as two possible theories:

theory #1 the assumption that light-speed (in vacuum) is constant which needs to be checked by experiment
theory #2 the assumption that light-speed (in vacuum) is constant and experiments need to adjusted to conform to that assumption


The first theory is a proper scientific theory, while the second theory isn't.

And most people are deceived that Einstein's special relativity is theory#1 that it has been checked with experiment and found to conform to the theory.

However, for those elite - it is not theory#1, it is theory#2.

Given the raw data – the data shows light-speed (in vacuum) is not constant!

However that raw data is then manipulated so that it then conforms to theory#2 which is not a proper scientific theory.

People are being misled that theory#1 is being confirmed, they have totally the wrong perception of what the experiments really show.

And the raw data becomes classified top secret.

Only the processed data is allowed out, while the raw data before they do the manipulation is suppressed.

So that's how they are able to maintain Einstein as the hero genius.

Its as simple as that, and they don't just stop with Einstein, they do it with the rest of the sciences – because as I said – science is a political football.

If we look back at Galileo – the political establishment (allied with the Church) did not like the experiments and the observations that Galileo was making. Since then – things have moved on – the political establishment don't like certain experimental results so they suppress them. The political establishment learnt its lesson with Galileo and now takes a firmer control of experiments – stopping what it does not like.

This all sounds unbelievable to a politically naïve person, but it is how modern society has now been built – the control and suppression of undesired science.

Now for the evidence:

As per William H. Cantrell, Ph.D. : “That the speed of light is not constant in interplanetary space was first suspected by the late Bryan G. Wallace. Throughout the 1960s and into the 1970s, MIT Lincoln Laboratory operated a series of high-power radio transmitters spread across the United States. Technically, these sites held a SECRET classification during the height of the Cold War and the Space-Race, even though the researchers were doing pure science.”

One does not expect “pure science” research to be top secret, but that's what it turned out to be. The fact that speed of light in vacuum is not constant, and hence Einstein is wrong, Wallace discovered was top secret. (i.e. I mean theory#1 is wrong.)

William H. Cantrell, Ph.D.: “Wallace discovered that radar data for the planet Venus did not confirm the constancy of the speed of light. Alarmed and intrigued by these results, he noticed systematic variations in the data with diurnal and lunar-synodic components. He attempted to publish the results in Physical Review Letters, but he encountered considerable resistance. His analysis indicated a heretical "c + v" Galilean fit to the data, so as a result, he had no alternative but to publish elsewhere. To say that Wallace was less than tactful would be something of an understatement. He made heated claims that NASA had noticed the very same results and was using non-relativistic correction factors to calculate signal transit times. He also claimed that, despite his repeated requests, MIT Lincoln Lab refused to share the raw data from the Venus radar studies with him—that they were part of a government conspiracy to keep the Soviets in the dark about the true nature of the speed of light!”

And the conspiracy to keep the Soviets in the dark obviously must extend to everyone else or they would tell the Soviets. Wallace was then subjected to the usual treatment for anyone daring to speak the truth.

Ref: http://www.infinite-energy.com/iemagazine/issue59/adissidentview.html

Einstein was involved in conspiracy plans with his scientist friends that there should be a worldwide elite of scientists that held no loyalty to the countries they lived in so that they could control the world. I wonder if that group is suppressing scientific truth across the international boundaries.

This conspiracy was inspired by such things as HG Wells' book “The Open Conspiracy”.

For the conspiracy around Einstein, see for instance “The Einstein File” - ref: http://www.theeinsteinfile.com/ quote: “he [Einstein] was in fact intensely interested in the larger society and felt it was his duty to use his worldwide fame to help advance the cause of social justice. Einstein was a fervent pacifist, socialist, internationalist, and an outspoken critic of racism (he considered racism America's "worst disease")” – all these things made him look like a security threat to the American FBI.

That deals with the special relativity. Next: general relativity.

The New Physics, ed. Paul Davies, Cambridge University Press 1989, Clifford Will p 7: “During the two decades 1960- 80, the subject of general relativity experienced a rebirth. Despite its enormous influence on scientific thought in the early years, by the late 1950s general relativity had become a sterile formalistic subject cut off from the mainstream of physics.”

Einstein died in 1955, “they” had a rebirth of general relativity – sometimes “they” call it a renaissance of general relativity straight after Einstein died. And “they” rewrote the theory!!


Professor Kip Thorne in his masterful book “Black Holes and time warps” 1994 p 111 : “Einstein calls it spacetime curvature; Newton calls it tidal gravity. But there is just one agent acting. Therefore, spacetime curvature and tidal gravity must be precisely the same thing, expressed in different languages.”

But that is a rewrite and not how Einstein originally had it. Due to Einstein making mistakes he had things different. The way that Thorne has it is – Newtonian physics and general relativity are the same thing expressed in different language. But Einstein had them as different things because of his mistakes. So Thorne (who is one of the elite) has revised Einstein's general relativity, corrected some of Einstein's mistakes; revised Einstein after Einstein has died. But as fan of Einstein, he amends Einstein's mistakes and does not make big publicity that he has amended Einstein. The headlines should be Einstein wrong and his theory amended. Yet the elite don't do that, “they” just amend Einstein to now make the theory the same as Newton's except for disguising it in a complicated language. They know they don't go by the original Einstein, and don't care that those beneath them in the hierarchy of the physics community are being left to not have proper grasp of the theories. It is update by subterfuge, leaving the ordinary ranks confused, with the elite not caring and having a different understanding of physics.

Further details on these issues are dealt with by my articles at:
http://www.wbabin.net/Science-Journals-Papers/Author/449/Roger,%20Anderton

From my investigations – Newtonian physics properly means Boscovich's theory and from that Quantum theory was derived. Thus undo the mistakes of Einstein and we have the unified theory as Boscovich's.

Lectures for Boscovich on the Web
Boscovich lecture at Royal Society
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E2vcb6x_50M

part 1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1wbgDQL0Mq8

Boscovich lecture at Royal Society 2012 by Ivica Martinovic.
Finishes Boscovich bio and starts on Boscovich's contributions to the natural sciences.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGqX2QXyH_4&feature=related

Boscovich lecture at Royal Society part 3 2012 by Martinovic.
Boscovich's theory and Boscovich's curve of force.
New insight into structure of matter.
Boscovich model of (chemical element) atom.
Boscovich on Relativity.
Boscovich changes Newton's 2nd law.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c03yreKAaPw&feature=related

part 4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GrU538utit8&feature=related


Boscovich lecture at Royal Society 2012 part 5
Boscovich introduces quantisation into physics - first mention of quantisation ever.
Quantum physics beginnings in the 18th Century
Boscovich's metrology papers - Northern lights caused by substances from the Sun
Boscovich's contributions to technical sciences

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xU42Y6Rxs4

Boscovich lecture at Royal Society 2012 part 6
Structural engineering
Humanities

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VswFkAZSh8c&feature=related

part 7

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsWl0Q6JmMU&feature=related

part 8

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T7owRwk4MXQ&feature=related

Boscovich exhibit at Royal Society 2012 part 1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t7haFjGX1pw&feature=related

part 2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ERjgAspudDs&feature=related

part3

Other videos:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MsOo-W49kJo

The Catholic Church - Builder of Civilization, Episode 3: Priests as Scientific Pioneers, by Thomas E Wood
15.59 –16.34 mentions Boscovich as Father of Atomic theory
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hlE7xvc4LoY
The Catholic Church - Builder of Civilization, Episode 4: The Galileo Case, by Thomas E Wood
22.23- 22.40 Boscovich mentioned
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pPaZzixRGVM
James Burke: The day the universe changed

2.14- 4.00 says prohibition on Copernicus lifted mainly due to Boscovich



Galileo and Boscovich by J.L. Heilbron

-comparisons in their careers.

http://vimeo.com/32286048

Boscovich 2011

--in foreign language, have to read subtext; lecture followed by operatic singer

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IM5PY9H2d_o

Ivica Martinovic lecture on Boscovich audio:

http://downloads.royalsociety.org/audio/Boscovich.mp3

Further information on Boscovich:

There is an Institute named after him, he has a museum and his has statues.

If there had not been a massive diversion with Einstein circa 1919 then the physics community would have been dealing with Boscovich's theory.

c.RJAnderton2012