| News at 14 April 2012:
Einstein being wrong has been Top Secret
Einstein is wrong and NASA knows that Einstein is wrong. NASA is famous as
being also known as “Never A Straight Answer”. There are plenty of other
conspiracies on the web about NASA; so why shouldn't they cover up about
Einstein as well, and the answer is of course there is.
There is an elite in the Physics community that knows Einstein is wrong,
and they are maintaining the false front that Einstein is still a genius;
they don't care that those below them are deceived and working from a
physics that is wrong.
All of this is of course just another small part of a vast cover-up.
Einstein is there to cover-up a lot of other things. If there was no
Einstein to divert physics enthusiasts then they might take Tesla related
things more seriously. So Einstein is absolutely necessary to sit on top
of the pyramid and cover up everything else they don't want you to know
about in physics.
Before citing the evidence of the information sources, first a little
history:
Einstein became famous in 1919 straight after World War 1, he fled to
America before the start of World War 2 and backed the Allies against the
Germans. He was on the winning side in both World Wars, he was hailed as
genius, a hero a pacifist etc etc. So he has an enormous fan base for
being a hero. But most heroes turn out to have feet of clay.
Try now to look at it from another perspective: for us he was hero, but
from the other side of the wars he looked different. During World War 1
instead of being a patriotic German, backing Germany; he was a pacifist
during the war and he was with a group of fellow German pacifists blaming
Germany for starting the war. He was not patriotic to his country, from
his country's viewpoint he was a traitor. For us a hero, to the other side
he was a traitor. He was on the winning side in both World Wars and
history gets written by the winners not the losers, so the winners' view
of him prevails – that of him being a hero, and the loser’s point of view
gets ignored; hence massive publicity of just what a genius and hero
Einstein is.
Taking the point-of-view that Einstein is wrong – well that's almost like
taking the view that Hitler was right; so its not something his fans want
to do.
Physics should not be about personalities. But sadly in Einstein's case it
is; it is a political issue that he must be portrayed as a hero genius. So
Einstein being wrong is not something his fans want. Einstein stumbled a
bit on quantum theory with his clash with Bohr, allowance is made by his
fans for that; but for Einstein's relativity theories – his personal
theories – his fans don't want him wrong about that. Hence this fan-based
support for this massive cover-up. The experimental evidence does not
agree with Einstein, and an elite knows it does not agree, but because its
political they cover it up. Every now and again an experimental result
might break through claiming a result that disagrees with Einstein. But
what “they” (who want to cover-up) then do is go back and cover it up,
claiming the experiment was done wrong.
The cover-up is just massive, and it is not just about Einstein, it
extends to the rest of the sciences. Results that are deemed politically
incorrect are covered up.
As some conspiracy theorists say – it does not matter who you vote for,
the government still gets in. The same corruption is applied to
experiments – if experiments could actually prove something they didn't
want us to know then they would be banned. Results they don't want get
rejected.
What we have is the Corruption of Science – science has become a political
football.
Einstein's relativity is a bit obscure, but for the sake of illustration,
I will highlight how one aspect of it can be represented namely -
Einstein's special relativity can be looked at it as two possible
theories:
theory #1 the assumption that light-speed (in vacuum) is constant which
needs to be checked by experiment
theory #2 the assumption that light-speed (in vacuum) is constant and
experiments need to adjusted to conform to that assumption
The first theory is a proper scientific theory, while the second theory
isn't.
And most people are deceived that Einstein's special relativity is
theory#1 that it has been checked with experiment and found to conform to
the theory.
However, for those elite - it is not theory#1, it is theory#2.
Given the raw data – the data shows light-speed (in vacuum) is not
constant!
However that raw data is then manipulated so that it then conforms to
theory#2 which is not a proper scientific theory.
People are being misled that theory#1 is being confirmed, they have
totally the wrong perception of what the experiments really show.
And the raw data becomes classified top secret.
Only the processed data is allowed out, while the raw data before they do
the manipulation is suppressed.
So that's how they are able to maintain Einstein as the hero genius.
Its as simple as that, and they don't just stop with Einstein, they do it
with the rest of the sciences – because as I said – science is a political
football.
If we look back at Galileo – the political establishment (allied with the
Church) did not like the experiments and the observations that Galileo was
making. Since then – things have moved on – the political establishment
don't like certain experimental results so they suppress them. The
political establishment learnt its lesson with Galileo and now takes a
firmer control of experiments – stopping what it does not like.
This all sounds unbelievable to a politically naïve person, but it is how
modern society has now been built – the control and suppression of
undesired science.
Now for the evidence:
As per William H. Cantrell, Ph.D. : “That the speed of light is not
constant in interplanetary space was first suspected by the late Bryan G.
Wallace. Throughout the 1960s and into the 1970s, MIT Lincoln Laboratory
operated a series of high-power radio transmitters spread across the
United States. Technically, these sites held a SECRET classification
during the height of the Cold War and the Space-Race, even though the
researchers were doing pure science.”
One does not expect “pure science” research to be top secret, but that's
what it turned out to be. The fact that speed of light in vacuum is not
constant, and hence Einstein is wrong, Wallace discovered was top secret.
(i.e. I mean theory#1 is wrong.)
William H. Cantrell, Ph.D.: “Wallace discovered that radar data for the
planet Venus did not confirm the constancy of the speed of light. Alarmed
and intrigued by these results, he noticed systematic variations in the
data with diurnal and lunar-synodic components. He attempted to publish
the results in Physical Review Letters, but he encountered considerable
resistance. His analysis indicated a heretical "c + v" Galilean fit to the
data, so as a result, he had no alternative but to publish elsewhere. To
say that Wallace was less than tactful would be something of an
understatement. He made heated claims that NASA had noticed the very same
results and was using non-relativistic correction factors to calculate
signal transit times. He also claimed that, despite his repeated requests,
MIT Lincoln Lab refused to share the raw data from the Venus radar studies
with him—that they were part of a government conspiracy to keep the
Soviets in the dark about the true nature of the speed of light!”
And the conspiracy to keep the Soviets in the dark obviously must extend
to everyone else or they would tell the Soviets. Wallace was then
subjected to the usual treatment for anyone daring to speak the truth.
Ref:
http://www.infinite-energy.com/iemagazine/issue59/adissidentview.html
Einstein was involved in conspiracy plans with his scientist friends that
there should be a worldwide elite of scientists that held no loyalty to
the countries they lived in so that they could control the world. I wonder
if that group is suppressing scientific truth across the international
boundaries.
This conspiracy was inspired by such things as HG Wells' book “The Open
Conspiracy”.
For the conspiracy around Einstein, see for instance “The Einstein File” -
ref: http://www.theeinsteinfile.com/ quote: “he [Einstein] was in fact
intensely interested in the larger society and felt it was his duty to use
his worldwide fame to help advance the cause of social justice. Einstein
was a fervent pacifist, socialist, internationalist, and an outspoken
critic of racism (he considered racism America's "worst disease")” – all
these things made him look like a security threat to the American FBI.
That deals with the special relativity. Next: general relativity.
The New Physics, ed. Paul Davies, Cambridge University Press 1989,
Clifford Will p 7: “During the two decades 1960- 80, the subject of
general relativity experienced a rebirth. Despite its enormous influence
on scientific thought in the early years, by the late 1950s general
relativity had become a sterile formalistic subject cut off from the
mainstream of physics.”
Einstein died in 1955, “they” had a rebirth of general relativity –
sometimes “they” call it a renaissance of general relativity straight
after Einstein died. And “they” rewrote the theory!!
Professor Kip Thorne in his masterful book “Black Holes and time warps”
1994 p 111 : “Einstein calls it spacetime curvature; Newton calls it tidal
gravity. But there is just one agent acting. Therefore, spacetime
curvature and tidal gravity must be precisely the same thing, expressed in
different languages.”
But that is a rewrite and not how Einstein originally had it. Due to
Einstein making mistakes he had things different. The way that Thorne has
it is – Newtonian physics and general relativity are the same thing
expressed in different language. But Einstein had them as different things
because of his mistakes. So Thorne (who is one of the elite) has revised
Einstein's general relativity, corrected some of Einstein's mistakes;
revised Einstein after Einstein has died. But as fan of Einstein, he
amends Einstein's mistakes and does not make big publicity that he has
amended Einstein. The headlines should be Einstein wrong and his theory
amended. Yet the elite don't do that, “they” just amend Einstein to now
make the theory the same as Newton's except for disguising it in a
complicated language. They know they don't go by the original Einstein,
and don't care that those beneath them in the hierarchy of the physics
community are being left to not have proper grasp of the theories. It is
update by subterfuge, leaving the ordinary ranks confused, with the elite
not caring and having a different understanding of physics.
Further details on these issues are dealt with by my articles at:
http://www.wbabin.net/Science-Journals-Papers/Author/449/Roger,%20Anderton
From my investigations – Newtonian physics properly means Boscovich's
theory and from that Quantum theory was derived. Thus undo the mistakes of
Einstein and we have the unified theory as Boscovich's.
Lectures for Boscovich on the Web
Boscovich lecture at Royal Society
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E2vcb6x_50M
part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1wbgDQL0Mq8
Boscovich lecture at Royal Society 2012 by Ivica Martinovic.
Finishes Boscovich bio and starts on Boscovich's contributions to the
natural sciences.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGqX2QXyH_4&feature=related
Boscovich lecture at Royal Society part 3 2012 by Martinovic.
Boscovich's theory and Boscovich's curve of force.
New insight into structure of matter.
Boscovich model of (chemical element) atom.
Boscovich on Relativity.
Boscovich changes Newton's 2nd law.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c03yreKAaPw&feature=related
part 4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GrU538utit8&feature=related
Boscovich lecture at Royal Society 2012 part 5
Boscovich introduces quantisation into physics - first mention of
quantisation ever.
Quantum physics beginnings in the 18th Century
Boscovich's metrology papers - Northern lights caused by substances from
the Sun
Boscovich's contributions to technical sciences
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xU42Y6Rxs4
Boscovich lecture at Royal Society 2012 part 6
Structural engineering
Humanities
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VswFkAZSh8c&feature=related
part 7
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsWl0Q6JmMU&feature=related
part 8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T7owRwk4MXQ&feature=related
Boscovich exhibit at Royal Society 2012 part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t7haFjGX1pw&feature=related
part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ERjgAspudDs&feature=related
part3
Other videos:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MsOo-W49kJo
The Catholic Church - Builder of Civilization, Episode 3: Priests as
Scientific Pioneers, by Thomas E Wood
15.59 –16.34 mentions Boscovich as Father of Atomic theory
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hlE7xvc4LoY
The Catholic Church - Builder of Civilization, Episode 4: The Galileo
Case, by Thomas E Wood
22.23- 22.40 Boscovich mentioned
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pPaZzixRGVM
James Burke: The day the universe changed
2.14- 4.00 says prohibition on Copernicus lifted mainly due to Boscovich
Galileo and Boscovich by J.L. Heilbron
-comparisons in their careers.
http://vimeo.com/32286048
Boscovich 2011
--in foreign language, have to read subtext; lecture followed by operatic
singer
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IM5PY9H2d_o
Ivica Martinovic lecture on Boscovich audio:
http://downloads.royalsociety.org/audio/Boscovich.mp3
Further information on Boscovich:
There is an Institute named after him, he has a museum and his has
statues.
If there had not been a massive diversion with Einstein circa 1919 then
the physics community would have been dealing with Boscovich's theory.
c.RJAnderton2012 |