Boscovich's theory does not answer that question; it is a unified theory
dealing with particles, but does not explain how some particles can be
alive and others not. (This is as far as I know, not all of Boscovich’s
work has been translated from Latin into English; hence not all has been
read by me.)
Whyte dealt with the issue by what he called the Unitary Principle -
basically it is how the particles form themselves into certain patterns
that replicate themselves that gives life. When particles form themselves
into a well-ordered structure such as crystal, then they are pretty much
inert and no longer self-replicating; apart from merely continuing the
process of crystallisation. (The Unitary Principle has gone by a lot of
different names by other Researchers such as being called Life Force.
Often it is interpreted in the Religious point-of-view as the work of a
Higher Intelligence – i.e. God, while in the Ancient Astronaut hypothesis
this Intelligence might sometimes be interpreted as an extremely advanced
alien.)
So under Whyte's theory- Boscovich's theory gets extended to what can be
called the Unitary Field Theory.
Baranski wrote a book on this which does not deal with the maths, and is
very difficult to get hold of. He also did the experiment that showed how
life began on Earth - radiation from the Sun acts as catalysis, causing
atomic particles to engage in pattern forming that we call life. As a
result he showed that the conditions for Life are common throughout the
Universe.
He was working in the early stages of the Apollo Moon mission; his task
was to find out how to protect the astronauts from space radiation once
they had left the Earth's protective field.
Unfortunately not all of Baranski’s work seems accessible to the public.
By this UFT - structures on the large scale are repeating themselves on
the small scale; reality is fractal, and on the Planck scale of size there
are mini-wormholes as per what John Wheeler says. Also as per string
theory at that scale - one is looking at higher dimensions where energy
comes in from a higher dimension through these mini-wormholes, and that
means it is free energy as far as our "perceived universe" is concerned.
My interest with all of this: I checked the mathematics of modern physics
and came up with a very simple theory; I checked back in history and the
theory was first proposed by an 18th century Catholic priest Father Roger
Boscovich. I then looked into what happened to this theory, and began
digging up the Forgotten/ Suppressed Past. I suspect that others have to a
certain extent come up with the same type of theory; but the first person
to propose the theory as far as I am aware was Father Boscovich; and these
"others" try to say that their theory is "new"--- ignoring the past
history of who was FIRST with the proposal for the Unified Field theory,
and ignoring how that theory was built upon by Einstein and his
associates.
THE MAIN THREAD OF UFT IS:
Boscovich ->Faraday ->Maxwell->Einstein->LL Whyte -> Baranski
However many other scientists are involved for instance David Bohm was
working on the ideas of LL Whyte, Thomas Bearden was working on the ideas
of Maxwell, and Tesla’s theory is related to this because his education
was Boscovichian.
Web site: http://www.faculty.fairfield.edu/jmac/sj/scientists/boscovich.htm
says: “Two hundred years ago February 13, 1787 the Croatian Jesuit
mathematician Roger Boscovich,S.J. died. He developed the first coherent
description of atomic theory in his work Theoria Philosophiae Naturalis ,
which is one of the great attempts to understand the structure of the
universe in a single idea.”
I say: Boscovich’s theory is the start to Unified Field Theory (UFT).
What is not widely known is that the leading physicists of the 20th
Century were working from Boscovich's theory; because Boscovich's theory
was the Foundation of 20th Century Atomic physics.
The information for all of this is hidden away in obscure places.
Boscovich was a Catholic priest-cum- scientist, and there are still lots
of priest-scientists around doing their own scientific researches
"outside" of the mainstream of the science community.
One of these priest-cum-scientists says Boscovich is the founder of 20th
Cent. Atomic physics:
Peter Henricis priest, PhD Professor of Philosophy says in his article:
The Theory of Knowledge of Ruder Boskovic in his time:
"Boskovic (aka Boscovich) made real atom physics possible and therefore he
is rightly regarded as its actual forerunner or founder."
One of the scientists working on UFT was Whyte, this is mentioned at site
dealing with Whyte’s diaries; which unfortunately has now removed that
information (philosphere.com site); it did say :
“Lancelot Law Whyte was not appreciated in Great Britain but was
celebrated in the US. He fought in the First World War, and was a
brilliant mathematical physicist employed in industry, investment banker
and scientific consultant on financing new inventions, chairman and
managing director of Power Jets, Ltd. which developed the Whittle jet
engine, as well as serving as Director of Statistical Enquiries in the
Ministry of Supplies. But his main interest was as a philosopher of
science and as a postulator of human inquiry and development. …Whyte
appeared to know all of the authors here who were within his generation.
He gave a keynote memorial address for the Institute of General Semantics
in honour of Korzybski, and corresponded with Bois. Bohm knew and admired
him and carried on the work of expressing the unified theory in physics
after Whyte died.”
What is to note is that they mention David Bohm was working from Whyte's
ideas. And site:
http://www.fdavidpeat.com/bibliography/books/infinite.htm
says of David Bohm:
“This is the first biography of David Bohm, brilliant physicist, explorer
of consciousness, student of Oppenheimer, friend of Einstein, and enemy to
the House Un-American Activities Committee. As both his friend and fellow
physicist, no one is better positioned than F. David Feat to tell the
story of this extraordinary scientist, one of the most original thinkers
of the second half of the twentieth century, a man who made influential
contributions to physics, philosophy, consciousness, psychology, language,
and education.”
One of the things to note is that David Bohm is mentioned as an ‘enemy’
--- Bohm became unpopular with quite a few people; and it seems to be this
among other reasons why there is prejudice against UFT from an Academia
that would prefer to block all of this information on UFT by simply not
talking about all the scientists that have been working on it.
There have been a great number of scientists working on UFT, and Academia
responds by ostracizing them whenever possible.
All of the scientific issues raised by this theoretical development touch
upon issues such as the paranormal and ETs that academia wishes to be in a
state of denial about.
I have now been in contact with various people that have been working on
these theoretical ideas either directly or indirectly; and was amazed to
be informed that Scientific Academia had made a deal a long time ago with
the Religious Priesthood that “they” have an agreed censorship between
them. This agreed censorship seems to be another reason why UFT is not
allowed to be talked about too much; because it would impinge upon
religious beliefs. |